Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 516 U.S. 1 - Wood v. Bartholomew

Wood v. Bartholomew’s Empirical Analysis

1995

Citation profile

486
cited by 486 later decisions
4
cited 4 times by the Supreme Court
16
states following
June 2022
most recently cited

147 federal appellate · 19 district · 116 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 486 later decisions (4 by the Supreme Court) — most recently June 2022 · most notably Calderon v. Thompson (1998), United States v. Perez (2002)

147 federal appellate · 19 district · 116 state decisions — followed in 16 states

25501995200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Appellate journey

reviewedBartholomew v. Wood (from Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals)

Relationships

Relies on Brady v. State of Maryland · United States v. Bagley · Kyles v. Whitley · 98 Wash. 2d 173 - State v. Bartholomew

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 486 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “if there is a reasonable probability that, had the evidence been disclosed to the defense, the result of the proceeding would have been different.”
    13 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “based on mere speculation, in violation of the standards we have established.”
    12 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
  3. “[I]t is not `reasonably likely' that disclosure of the polygraph results — inadmissible under state law — would have resulted in a different outcome at trial.”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.