Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 517 A2D 1069 - In Re O'Donnell

In Re O'Donnell’s Empirical Analysis

1986

Citation profile

13
cited by 13 later decisions
1
states following
January 2011
most recently cited

13 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 13 later decisions — most recently January 2011

13 state decisions

1001986199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on In Re Roundtree · Matter of Lieber · In Re Roundtree · Matter of Fogel · In Re Taylor

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Were it not for the existence of [a $400,-000 civil judgment in favor of the respondent’s clients against the respondent], I would vote to require far greater restitution to [the clients] than a mere $1,000, which represents only a refund of the retainer they paid to respondent and does not even begin to make them whole.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.