Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 517 F.2d 1359 - Steinberg v. Seitz

Steinberg v. Seitz’s Empirical Analysis

517 F.2d 1359 · 1975

Citation profile

19
cited by 19 later decisions
May 2023
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 5 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 19 later decisions — most recently May 2023

2 federal appellate · 5 district ·

60197519801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 35 U.S.C. § 102

Relies on Gubelmann v. Gang · Young v. Dworkin · Hugh S. Knowles v. George C. Tibbetts · Hull v. Davenport · In re Anthony

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 19 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “that the invention, when tested, be in a commercially satisfactory stage of development.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “the testing should demonstrate ` the soundness of the principles of operation of the invention.' The inventor need show only that the invention is `suitable' for its intended use.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.