United States ex rel. Wojtycha v. Hopkins’s Empirical Analysis
517 F.2d 420 · 1975
Citation profile
33 federal appellate · 5 district · 3 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 51 later decisions — most recently September 2025 · most notably Sevier v. Turner (1984), Lee Moi Chong v. District Director, Immigration & Naturalization Service (2001)
33 federal appellate · 5 district · 3 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Carafas v. J · Jones v. Cunningham · Garrity v. State of New Jersey · Hurtado v. People of the State of California · Eisenstadt v. Baker
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 51 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The `in-custody' jurisdictional requirement is determined as of the date the petition is filed in the district court.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“restraints not shared by the public generally,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Tinder v. Paula
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.