State v. Erickson’s Empirical Analysis
1994
Citation profile
8 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently July 2012
8 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on State v. Jordheim · State v. Zimmerman · State v. Reil · Bieber v. North Dakota Department of Transportation Director · Schense v. Hjelle
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The defendant may rebut the prosecution’s documentary foundation of fair administration by establishing either a deviation from approved procedures or a lack of fair administration despite compliance. Once the defendant has successfully rebutted the prosecution’s pri- ma facie showing, the prosecution may present testimony to show fair administration despite defendant’s rebuttal.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Stroh
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.