Scott v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1994
Citation profile
3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
September 1997
most recently cited
3 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Giles v. State · State v. Mabry · Langley v. Scurr · Backstrom v. Iowa District Court for Jones County · SHANNON BY SHANNON v. Hansen
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Iowa Code section 903A.4 states in part: The director of the Iowa department of corrections shall develop policy and procedural rules to implement sections 903A.1 through 903A.3. The rules may specify disciplinary offenses which may result in the loss of good conduct time, and the amount of good conduct time which may be lost as a result of each disciplinary offense.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Mahan v. State“upon finding that an inmate has violated an institutional rule, the independent administrative law judge may order forfeiture of any or all good conduct time earned.... The independent administrative law judge has discretion within the guidelines established ... to determine the amount of time that should be forfeited based upon the severity of the violation.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Kistner v. State“may order forfeiture of any or all good conduct time earned ... and has discretion ... to determine the amount of time that should be forfeited based upon the severity of the violation.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Mahan v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.