Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 517 U.S. 830 - Exxon Co. v. Sofec, Inc.

Exxon Co. v. Sofec, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis

1996

Citation profile

424
cited by 424 later decisions
38
cited 38 times by the Supreme Court
4
states following
October 2024
most recently cited

135 federal appellate · 41 district · 16 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 424 later decisions (38 by the Supreme Court) — most recently October 2024 · most notably 134 S. Ct. 1377 - Lexmark Int'l, Inc. v. Static Control Components, Inc. (2014), Staub v. Proctor Hospital (2011)

135 federal appellate · 41 district · 16 state decisions

18301996200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Appellate journey

reviewedExxon Co. v. Sofec, Inc. (from Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals)

Relationships

Relies on East River Steamship Corp. v. Transamerica Delaval Inc. · United States v. Reliable Transfer Co. · Goodman v. Lukens Steel Co. · Graver Tank & Mfg. Co. v. Linde Air Products Co. · Milwaukee and Saint Paul Railway Company v. Kellogg

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 424 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “A cause can be thought 'superseding' only if it is a 'cause of independent origin that was not foreseeable.'”
    12 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “The issues of proximate causation and superseding cause involve application of law to fact, which is left to the factfinder, subject to limited review.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “the careless actor will [not] always be held for all damages for which the forces that he risked were a cause in fact. Somewhere a point will be reached when courts will agree that the link has become too tenuous-that what is claimed to be consequence is only fortuity. Thus, if the [negligent] destruction of the Michigan Avenue Bridge had delayed the arrival of a doctor, with consequent loss of a patient’s life, few judges would impose liability.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.