Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 518 F.3d 230 - United States v. Mitchell

United States v. Mitchell’s Empirical Analysis

518 F.3d 230 · 2008

Citation profile

29
cited by 29 later decisions
1
states following
August 2024
most recently cited

15 federal appellate · 2 district · 1 state decisions

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1028 (Identity Theft and Assumption Deterrence Act of 1998) · 18 U.S.C. § 1028A · 18 U.S.C. § 1344 · 18 U.S.C. § 2314

Relies on Glasser v. United States · United States v. Ron Pair Enterprises, Inc. · United States v. Burgos · United States v. Morton · Ayes v. U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 29 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(A)name, social security number, date of birth, official State or government issued driver's license or identification number, alien registration number, government passport number, employer or taxpayer identification number; (B) unique biometric data, such as fingerprint, voice print, retina or iris image, or other unique physical representation; (C) unique electronic identification number, address, or routing code; or (D) telecommunication identifying information or access device (as defined in section 1029(e)).”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “any name or number that may be used, alone or in conjunction with any other information, to identify a specific individual.” 18 U.S.C. § 1028 (d)(7); see also United States v. Mitchell, 518 F.3d 230 , 234-35 (4th Cir.2008). 4 . The only language in § 1028A that could support Abdelshafi’s argument is the statute’s title of”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “must be sufficient to identify a specific individual.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.