518 F. Supp. 139 - United States v. Pyle’s Empirical Analysis
1981
Citation profile
6 federal appellate · 1 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently September 2000
6 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 15 U.S.C. § 17 (§ 6 of the Clayton Antitrust Act of 1914) · 18 U.S.C. § 1 · 18 U.S.C. § 3401 · 18 U.S.C. § 3402 · 18 U.S.C. § 3691 · 18 U.S.C. § 401 · 18 U.S.C. § 402 · 28 U.S.C. § 636
Relies on Jackson v. Virginia · Broadrick v. Oklahoma · Grayned v. City of Rockford · Duncan v. State of Louisiana · Thornhill v. Alabama
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“provided that the potential penalties for such contempts do not exceed misdemeanors, as defined in 18 U.S.C. § 1.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“(p)icketing, protesting, rallying, demonstrating or similarly assembling in the Whitman Construction Site Area.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“the accused, upon demand therefor, shall be entitled to trial by a jury....”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.