Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 518 NW2D 223 - State v. Abdo

State v. Abdo’s Empirical Analysis

1994

Citation profile

16
cited by 16 later decisions
3
states following
June 2019
most recently cited

16 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 16 later decisions — most recently June 2019

16 state decisions

100199420002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Simmons v. United States · Neil v. Biggers · Manson v. Brathwaite · State v. Sahlie · State v. Lykken

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “It is not the proper function of this [C]ourt to resolve evidentiary conflicts to determine the credibility of witnesses or weigh the evidence.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.