Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 518 SE2D 799 - In Re Leftwich

In Re Leftwich’s Empirical Analysis

1999

Citation profile

31
cited by 31 later decisions
2
states following
May 2019
most recently cited

30 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 31 later decisions — most recently May 2019 · most notably 143 N.C. App. 402 - In Re McMillon (2001), 147 N.C. App. 349 - In Re Nesbitt (2001)

30 state decisions

240199920002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Matter of Ballard · In Re Young

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 31 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “A juvenile who does not receive proper care, supervision, or discipline from the juvenile’s parent, guardian, custodian, or caretaker; or who has been abandoned; or who is not provided necessary medical care; or who is not provided necessary remedial care; or who lives in an environment injurious to the juvenile’s welfare; or who has been placed for care or adoption in violation of law ....”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “made any meaningful progress in eliminating the conditions that led to the removal of [the] children.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “"Once the court has determined that grounds for terminating parental rights are present, the court then `moves to the disposition stage to determine whether it is in the best interests of the child to terminate the parental rights.'" In re Leftwich, 135 N.C.App. 67, 71 , 518 S.E.2d 799, 802 (1999) (quoting In re Young, 346 N.C. 244, 247 , 485 S.E.2d 612, 615 (1997)). The trial court's decision to terminate parental rights is reviewed on an abuse of discretion standard. See In re Brim, 139 N.C.App. 733, 745 , 535 S.E.2d 367, 374 (2000); see also In re Allred, 122 N.C.App. at 569 , 471 S.E.2d at 88 .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.