Ebens v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1988
Citation profile
19 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 20 later decisions — most recently June 2018
19 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Hudson v. Palmer · Roan v. State · W. T. Ratliff Company, Inc. v. Purvis · Thomas v. State · Bascom v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“'Any communication or contact outside the jury room about the matters at trial between a juror and another person is forbidden where that contact”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“"Due to the apparent conflict between the judgment entry and the transcript of the sentencing proceeding, we remand this cause to the trial court with directions to resolve the conflict and determine if a proper allocution did in fact occur. If there was no allocution, the trial court is directed to conduct a new sentencing hearing in which a proper allocution is provided. The trial court should then make due return to this court."”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“`It is clearly the law that the jury "at all times has access to the trial court for legal instruction.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.