518 So. 2d 174 - Smith v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1987
Citation profile
9 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 9 later decisions — most recently August 2015
9 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Fare v. Michael C. · Lehnhausen v. Lake Shore Auto Parts Co. · Garcia v. Ingram · Ex Parte Whisenant · 410 So. 2d 449 - Craig v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“"(1) Appeals from final orders, judgments or decrees of the juvenile court shall be to the appropriate appellate court, subject to the Alabama Rules of Appellate Procedure, if: "(a) A record certified as adequate by the juvenile court judge or a stipulation of facts is available and the right to a jury trial has been exercised or waived by all parties entitled thereto; or, "(b) The parties stipulate that only questions of law are involved and the juvenile court certifies the questions."”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“'A variance is not a material variance unless it misleads the accused or is substantially injurious to him in making his defense.' Phillips v. State , 446 So.2d 57 , 62 (Ala.Cr.App. 1983), cert. denied, 467 U.S. 1254 [ 104 S.Ct. 3541 , 82 L.Ed.2d 845 ], (1984).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“However, an appeal before this court in which no transcript of the proceedings below existed would be valueless, since we can consider only what is contained in the record before us. See Clark v. State, 459 So.2d 988, 991 (Ala.Cr.App.1984).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.