Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 518 SO2D 61 - Cole v. Minor

Cole v. Minor’s Empirical Analysis

1987

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
3
states following
October 2022
most recently cited

6 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently October 2022

6 state decisions

3019871990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Heck v. Hall · Lietz v. Pfuehler · Brannon v. Varnado · 512 So. 2d 1297 - Whitehead v. Hester · 434 So. 2d 738 - Morgan v. Roberts

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Specifically, there are three quanta of interest that must be ascertained in order to construe a deed that contains a reservation. First, the quantum of interest specified in the granting clause must be determined. If the granting clause does not expressly limit the grant to a lesser amount, then the quantum of interest purportedly conveyed is 100 percent of all right, title and interest. The next step in this process is to ascertain the quantum of interest reserved in a subsequent clause. The final quantum to be determined is that quantum of interest the grantee is to receive under the deed. This amount can be calculated by subtracting the quantum of interest reserved to the grantor from the quantum of interest conveyed in the granting clause.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “the key question is, not what the grantor purported to retain for himself, but what he purported to give to the grantee.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.