Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 518 So. 2d 809 - Patterson v. State

518 So. 2d 809 - Patterson v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1987

Citation profile

11
cited by 11 later decisions
2
states following
May 2004
most recently cited

11 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 11 later decisions — most recently May 2004

11 state decisions

70198719902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on National Organization for Women, Inc. v. Idaho · Parrish v. State · Miller v. State · Kozlowski v. State · Deloney v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"The appellant argues that the trial court improperly denied his trial motion to receive credit for insurance proceeds paid to the victim's parents as a result of a civil settlement on this case citing § 15-18-75 . The appellant has presented no evidence other than his allegation in brief that the insurance company paid the victim's family any settlement. Under § 15-18-75 [the] appellant was not entitled to offset the amount of restitution by the amount of the settlement paid , and, furthermore, there was no proof of any civil settlement."”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “[Section] 13A-6-2 (a)(2) 'embrace[s] those homicides caused by . . . driving an automobile in a grossly wanton manner. '”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “manifesting extreme indifference to human life”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.