State v. Cecil

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided January 21, 1988

Supreme Court of Florida · decided 1988-01-21

Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently June 1994

5 state decisions

Key passage — most relied on by later courts

“Whether the holdings in Jones v. State, [ 477 So.2d 566 (Fla. 1985)]; State v. G.P., [ 476 So.2d 1272 (Fla. 1985)]; and State v. C.C., [ 476 So.2d 144 (Fla. 1985)], preclude the state from seeking common law certiorari review of non-appealable interlocutory orders in criminal cases.”

quoted by 1 later decision, including 530 So. 2d 924 - State v. Brea

Relies on 520 So. 2d 250 - State v. Pettis · 508 So. 2d 1249 - State v. Cecil

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1988-01-21

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER CURIAM.

¶1We have for review State v. Cecil, 508 So.2d 1249, 1250 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987), which certified the following question:

Whether the state is precluded from seeking common law certiorari review of non-appealable interlocutory orders in criminal cases.

¶2We have jurisdiction. Art. V, § 3(b)(4), Fla. Const. We have resolved this question in State v. Pettis, 520 So.2d 250 (Fla.1988), which held that the state is not precluded from seeking review of interlocutory orders by common law certiorari. Thus, we quash the decision below and remand for proceedings consistent with that opinion.

¶3It is so ordered.

EHRLICH, SHAW, BARKETT, GRIMES and KOGAN, JJ., concur.MCDONALD, C.J., and OVERTON, J., dissent.