Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 518 SO2D 975 - Hoyte v. State

Hoyte v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1988

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
February 1991
most recently cited

6 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 476 So. 2d 158 - Albritton v. State · 475 So. 2d 1218 - Hendrix v. State · 488 So. 2d 523 - State v. Mischler · Dickey v. State · Jean v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “We need not consider the effect of section 921.001(5) as amended by chapter 87-110, section 2, since the crime involved in this case was committed prior to July 1, 1987.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent
  2. “reasons for departure to which Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.701(d)(11) refers required”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent
  3. “that the facts supporting the reasons be credible and proven beyond a reasonable doubt.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.