Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 518 SW3D 847 - State v. Prince

State v. Prince’s Empirical Analysis

2017

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
April 2018
most recently cited

3 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on North Carolina v. Alford · State v. Mayes · State of Missouri v. Amanda N. Bazell · State v. Oliver · Brooks v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Rule 24.02(e) requires that a “court shall not accept a plea of guilty without first, by addressing the defendant personally in open court, determining that the plea is voluntary and not the result of force or -threats or of promises apart from a plea agreement.” Once the plea court has entered its unqualified acceptance of the plea, jeopardy is considered to have attached to the proceedings. Consequently, the plea court may not subsequently set aside the plea on its own motion without violating the constitutional prohibition against double jeopardy unless it determines that some material aspect of the plea proceeding rendered the plea unknowing or involuntary.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “These 'exceptions include pursuing a fleeing felon, preventing the imminent destruction of evidence, preventing a suspect's escape, or mitigating the danger of law enforcement or other persons inside or outside of the dwelling.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.