High v. Rhay’s Empirical Analysis
519 F.2d 109 · 1975
Citation profile
19
cited by 19 later decisions
2
states following
December 1988
most recently cited
8 federal appellate · 6 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Anders v. California · Griffin v. California · Gagnon v. Scarpelli · 78 Wash. 2d 327 - State v. Baker · 77 Wash. 2d 227 - State v. Nist
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 19 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“the probabilities are that any review of the record, in light of all the arguments which diligent and experienced counsel may make for High, will still result in affirmance of the conviction”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Barnes v. Jones“the court was simply invited to review the transcript to determine whether the evidence established that High was guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. 42 .... 43 ... The”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Barnes v. Jones“(a)ppointed counsel ... has a duty under Anders not only to raise such a non-frivolous argument, but to advocate it conscientiously on appeal.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Barnes v. Jones
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.