Burnside v. Eastern Airlines, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis
519 F.2d 1127 · 1975
Citation profile
34 federal appellate · 9 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 62 later decisions — most recently August 2018 · most notably 28 Ohio St. 3d 128 - Doe v. Trumbull County Children Services Board (1986), United States v. O'Neil (1983)
34 federal appellate · 9 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Isbell Enterprises, Inc. v. Citizens Casualty Co. of New York · Hodgson v. United Mine Workers of America · Wagner v. United States · Saenz v. Kenedy
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 62 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The time for notice of appeal on plaintiff's initial Rule 60(b) motion having run, the filing of another such motion alleging substantially similar grounds for relief does not provide plaintiff with a second opportunity for appellate review.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“appellate review would be limited to the district court's exercise of discretion in denying the Rule 60(b) motion, and would not have extended to consideration of the motion to dismiss.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“"Plaintiffs Burnside, Wooten and Hunter filed their initial complaint in this title VII employment discrimination suit on August 3, 1973. On January 18, 1974, the district court dismissed remaining plaintiff Burnside's amended complaint1”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.