Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 519 F.2d 294 - United States v. Watkins

United States v. Watkins’s Empirical Analysis

519 F.2d 294 · 1975

Citation profile

85
cited by 85 later decisions
5
states following
February 2010
most recently cited

64 federal appellate · 12 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 85 later decisions — most recently February 2010 · most notably United States v. Staten (1978), United States v. Jefferson (1991)

64 federal appellate · 12 state decisions

35019751980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Pointer v. Texas · 69 Cal. 2d 33 - Pacific Gas & Electric Co. v. G. W. Thomas Drayage & Rigging Co. · United States v. Holland · United States v. Bethea · United States v. Thomas E. Fench, United States of America v. William H. Blackwell

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 85 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “it is a matter of hornbook law that receipts are hearsay as independent evidence of the making of payment . . . .”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “(t)o prove constructive possession of narcotics the Government must show that the defendant was in a position or had the right to exercise dominion and control over the drugs.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “out-of-court declarations ... may be admitted for a material purpose other than the verity of the assertions.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.