Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 519 F.2d 304 - Lobis v. Secretary of the United States Air Force

Lobis v. Secretary of the United States Air Force’s Empirical Analysis

519 F.2d 304 · 1975

Citation profile

19
cited by 19 later decisions
October 2009
most recently cited

10 federal appellate · 6 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 19 later decisions — most recently October 2009

10 federal appellate · 6 district ·

601975198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Estep v. United States · Witmer v. United States · Ehlert v. United States · Bates v. Commander, First Coast Guard District · Kessler v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 19 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[A]n alleged failure to manifest ... new-found convictions in a changed life-style seems of minor significance at best. His medical career was of a nature commonly supposed to be oriented towards public service, and there was no evidence, before or after crystallization, of habits or life-style incompatible with sincerely held CO beliefs.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[s]omething more tangible than suspicion is needed to support a finding of insincerity.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “Appellant was then interviewed by a Navy chaplain. See 32 C.F.R. § 730.18(g). The chaplain found his beliefs sincere and recommended granting C.O. status. Finally, Lieutenant Goldstein was given a hearing before the designated Investigating Officer, Lieutenant Commander Hewett. The hearing officer prepared and forwarded the required written report on appellant. The report noted there was”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.