Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 519 F.2d 407 - Gwilliam v. United States

Gwilliam v. United States’s Empirical Analysis

519 F.2d 407 · 1975

Citation profile

66
cited by 66 later decisions
2
cited 2 times by the Supreme Court
August 2001
most recently cited

20 federal appellate · 1 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 66 later decisions (2 by the Supreme Court) — most recently August 2001 · most notably United States v. Nordic Village, Inc. (1992), Hoffman v. Connecticut Department of Income Maintenance (1989)

20 federal appellate · 1 district ·

2601975198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 11 U.S.C. § 103 · 28 U.S.C. § 1291

Relies on Local Loan Co. v. Hunt · Schmerler Ford, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board · In re Century Vault Co. · United States v. McGugin

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 66 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “It is manifest to us that the purpose of Congress in enacting § 35(c) was to provide both the bankrupt and IRS with the option to utilize the bankruptcy court forum in which the effect of the discharge of a federal tax indebtedness could be definitely determined and adjudicated in a uniform fashion and to grant the bankruptcy court with jurisdiction for that purpose. To conclude that the above option in favor of the Bankrupt could be utilized only if the IRS has filed a claim for the unpaid tax would distort and render meaningless the clearly expressed congressional language. (Citations omitted).”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. ““Hear and determine, . . . any question arising as to the amount or legality of any unpaid tax, whether or not previously assessed, which has not prior to bankruptcy been contested before and adjudicated by a judicial or administrative tribunal of competent jurisdiction ti”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “the Bankruptcy Court has jurisdiction to adjudicate the Bankrupt’s indebtedness . . . to be discharged in bankruptcy, notwithstanding the lack of a prior claim therefor or other proof thereof by IRS.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.