Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 519 F.2d 811 - Philippine Packing Corporation, a Corporation v. Maritime Company of the Philippines, Vessel Dynamic Venture, Her Hull, MacHinery Tackle and Apparel, Philippine Packing Corporation, a Corporation v. Maritime Company of the Philippines, Vessel Tagalog, Her Hull, MacHinery Tackle and Apparel

Philippine Packing Corporation, a Corporation v. Maritime Company of the Philippines, Vessel Dynamic Venture, Her Hull, MacHinery Tackle and Apparel, Philippine Packing Corporation, a Corporation v. Maritime Company of the Philippines, Vessel Tagalog, Her Hull, MacHinery Tackle and Apparel’s Empirical Analysis

519 F.2d 811 · 1975

Citation profile

19
cited by 19 later decisions
1
states following
June 2015
most recently cited

5 federal appellate · 2 district · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 19 later decisions — most recently June 2015

5 federal appellate · 2 district · 1 state decisions

9019751980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Gulf Oil Corporation v. Gilbert · Langnes v. Green · Swift & Co. Packers v. Compania Colombiana Del Caribe, S. A. · The Belgenland · Canada Malting Co. v. Paterson Steamships, Ltd.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 19 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “the burden of making a showing sufficient to justify the district court's refusal to retain jurisdiction rests on the moving party[,]”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.