Arthur v. Arthur’s Empirical Analysis
1988
Citation profile
7
cited by 7 later decisions
2
states following
May 1992
most recently cited
6 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 10 U.S.C. § 1408 · 26 U.S.C. § 411 (§ 1012 of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974)
Relies on McCarty v. McCarty · Paulussen v. Herion · Edsall v. SUPER. CT. IN & FOR COUNTY OF PIMA · United States v. Kimberlin · 192 N.J. Super. 594 - Castiglioni v. Castiglioni
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.