Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 519 NW2D 73 - DeVries v. DeVries

DeVries v. DeVries’s Empirical Analysis

1994

Citation profile

23
cited by 23 later decisions
1
states following
November 2025
most recently cited

23 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 23 later decisions — most recently November 2025

23 state decisions

1001994200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Malcolm v. Malcolm · Lien v. Lien · Gross v. Gross · Johnson v. Johnson · Senger v. Senger

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 23 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “whether we would have made the same ruling, but whether `a judicial mind, in view of the law and the circumstances of the particular case, could reasonably have reached such a conclusion.'”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “exercised to an end or purpose not justified by, and clearly against, reason and evidence.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “A trial court is vested with discretion in awarding alimony and its decision will not be disturbed unless it clearly appears the trial court abused its discretion. Trial courts must consider the following factors when setting an alimony award: (1) the length of the marriage; (2) the parties’ respective ages and health; (3) the earning capacity of each party; (4) their financial situations after the property division; (5) their station in life or social standing; and, (6) the relative fault in the termination of the marriage. A trial court’s findings on these factors must support its legal conclusions. As often stated, an abuse of discretion exists only where discretion has been ‘exercised to an end or purpose not justified by, and clearly against, reason and evidence.’”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.