Case v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1974
Citation profile
14 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently March 2009
14 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Katz v. United States · Coolidge v. New Hampshire · Sedillo v. United States · United States v. Jeffers · Trupiano v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““ . . . Therefore, once a defendant establishes that evidence was seized as the result of a search without a warrant, the burden shifts to the State to show that the search is reasonable because it falls within the ‘few specifically established and well delineated exceptions’ to the Fourth Amendment requirement that a search have the prior approval of a judge or magistrate. . . . ” (Citations omitted)”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage““Where, as in this case, the exception to the requirement of a warrant claimed is that the defendant consented to the search, the proof offered by the State must be ‘clear and convincing that the waiver was a free and voluntary act,’ Hogan v. State, 94 Okl.Cr. 375 , 236 P.2d 276, 277 (1951); Edwards v. State, 83 Okl.Cr. 340 , 177 P.2d [143] at 146.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Young
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.