Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 519 P2D 797 - Wortham v. State

Wortham v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1974

Citation profile

12
cited by 12 later decisions
3
states following
January 2010
most recently cited

12 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 12 later decisions — most recently January 2010

12 state decisions

9019741980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Morrissey v. Brewer · Gagnon v. Scarpelli · Oliver Lee Kirkland and Elizabeth Smith v. Paul H. Preston and Luke Moore · Hithe v. Nelson · Grano v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““[PJersons subjected to extradition proceedings are protected by certain constitutional rights which assure that the extradition power is not applied against them in an oppressive or arbitrary manner.””
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.