Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 519 Pa. 291 - Commonwealth v. Gallagher

Commonwealth v. Gallagher’s Empirical Analysis

1988

Citation profile

77
cited by 77 later decisions
4
states following
November 2015
most recently cited

77 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 77 later decisions — most recently November 2015 · most notably Commonwealth v. Simmons (1995), Commonwealth v. Dunkle (1992)

77 state decisions

3801988199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on State v. Kelly · 101 Wash. 2d 566 - State v. Petrich · Commonwealth v. O'SEARO · State v. Middleton · Commonwealth v. Seese

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 77 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[T]he question of whether a witness is testifying in a truthful manner is one that must be answered in reliance upon inferences drawn from the ordinary experiences of life and common knowledge as to the natural tendencies of human nature, as well as upon observations of the demeanor and character of the witness.”
    8 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “... this information was beyond the ordinary training, knowledge, intelligence and experience of the ordinary juror and assisted the jury in assessing the testimony of the victim ...”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
  3. “would lead inevitably to a situation where all psychological evidence would be barred.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.