519 So. 2d 1147 - Prestridge v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1988
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
December 1992
most recently cited
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 283 So. 2d 857 - Troupe v. Rowe · Brown v. State · Lerman v. Cornelius · 411 So. 2d 875 - State Ex Rel. Miller v. Swanson
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Prestridge now claims that double jeopardy safeguards preclude imposition of an increased sentence after the conclusion of the sentencing hearing. This principle does not pertain to Prestridge's sentence because it was the product of a plea agreement with the state. [e.s.]”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.