Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 519 SO2D 1376 - McCray v. State

McCray v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1988

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
2
states following
October 2020
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 414 So. 2d 998 - Dickerson v. State · Ex Parte Chambers · 455 So. 2d 295 - Lyons v. State · 474 So. 2d 685 - Ex Parte Robinson

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “" 'There is no similar provision with regard to the offense of trafficking in cocaine. In fact, the trafficking statute itself specifically rejects this argument by providing that "(a)ny person . . . who is knowingly in actual or constructive possession of, 28 grams or more of cocaine or of any mixture containing cocaine , described in section 20-2-25 (1), is guilty of a felony, which felony shall be known as `trafficking in cocaine.' " Alabama Code 1975, § 20-2-80 (2) (emphasis added). Under this statute, the State is not required to prove that the accused possessed 28 grams or more of pure cocaine.' "”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “'There is no similar provision with regard to the offense of trafficking in cocaine. In fact, the trafficking statute itself specifically rejects this argument by providing that”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.