Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 519 So. 2d 20 - Denmark v. State

519 So. 2d 20 - Denmark v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1987

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
August 1989
most recently cited

5 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 500 So. 2d 501 - Williams v. State · 459 So. 2d 1037 - Protective Cas. Ins. Co. v. Killane · Key v. State · 506 So. 2d 50 - Quarterman v. State · 413 So. 2d 840 - Robbins v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “IN LIGHT OF Williams v. State, 500 So.2d 501 (Fla.1986), MAY A TRIAL JUDGE EXCEED THE RECOMMENDED GUIDELINES SENTENCE BASED UPON A LEGITIMATE AND UNCOERCED CONDITION OF A PLEA BARGAIN?”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “[a] defendant cannot by agreement confer on the court the authority to impose an illegal sentence.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.