519 So. 2d 22 - Moore v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1987
Citation profile
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 487 So. 2d 1045 - State v. Whitfield · 493 So. 2d 82 - Davis v. State · 468 So. 2d 1081 - Moore v. State · 464 So. 2d 211 - Tucker v. State · 492 So. 2d 418 - Jaggers v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“A trial court must have the benefit of a properly prepared scoresheet before it can make a fully informed decision on whether to depart from the recommended sentence.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“This is because the trial court may well not wish to depart, or to depart so extensively, from a guidelines sentence which is presumably substantially lower than the one which it previously considered....”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.