519 So. 2d 32 - State v. Crocker’s Empirical Analysis
1987
Citation profile
7
cited by 7 later decisions
1
states following
August 1994
most recently cited
7 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 356 So. 2d 315 - State v. Harris · 463 So. 2d 1136 - State v. Phillips · 393 So. 2d 1175 - Peek v. Wainwright
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“prior thefts must be alleged in the charging document and proved in all instances before an accused may be found guilty of felony petit theft.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“[w]e find no reason why we should protect an accused from possible prejudice by keeping evidence of his prior convictions from the jury and then hold that he cannot be convicted of the crime because he is so protected.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Young v. State“[u]pon a third or subsequent conviction for petit theft, the offender shall be guilty of a felony of the third degree, punishable as provided in ss. 775.082, 775.083, and 775.084.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Young v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.