Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

519 So. 2d 41

519 So.2d 41

13 Fla.L.Weekly 90

Hammond v. Eastmoore

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided December 24, 1987

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1987-12-24

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently September 1989

1 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1987-12-24

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER CURIAM.

¶1DENIED.

ORFINGER and SHARP, JJ., concur.DAUKSCH, J., concurs specially, with opinion.
DAUKSCH, Judge,

¶2concurring specially.

¶3I agree we should deny the petition for writ of prohibition. The trial judge who recused himself after the first motion for disqualification, Judge Eastmoore, may have acted in a manner differently from the proper way cases are reassigned after recusal, by sending the case to Judge Perry, but that is not a matter for our immediate concern. Perhaps it would have been best for the chief circuit judge to make the reassignment but this court is not concerned with overseeing the day-to-day operation of trial courts’ administration. If petitioner can point to some jurisdictional defect or later show some reversible error then we will intercede.

/519/so2d/41 · .json · Public domain