Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 519 So. 2d 438 - Grayer v. State

519 So. 2d 438 - Grayer v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1988

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
May 2008
most recently cited

6 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently May 2008

6 state decisions

40198819902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Thames v. State · 481 So. 2d 820 - Isom v. State · Evans v. State · 241 So. 2d 158 - Box v. State · Grayer v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[B]y way of analogy, we consider heat of passion manslaughter a lesser-included offense to the charge of murder, even though that particular form of manslaughter contemplates proof of facts inconsistent with the principal charge of murder.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “The element of "previous chaste character" contemplated by Section 2361 is not inconsistent with forcible rape under Section 2358. That the jury may find the victim of previous chaste character would in no way preclude a conviction under Section 2358 if the other elements of forcible rape be proven.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “is sufficiently a constituent offense of forcible rape such that a plea-bargain-induced guilty plea thereto under an indictment charging forcible rape will withstand subsequent post-conviction attack.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.