State v. Martin’s Empirical Analysis
1988
Citation profile
16 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 16 later decisions — most recently September 2018
16 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on United States v. Wade · Schmerber v. State of California · Gilbert v. California · United States v. Dionisio · Wardius v. Oregon
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[I]f the state can compel a criminal defendant to demonstrate his physical characteristics before the jury without infringing on his fifth amendment rights [which it can], a defendant's offer of such a demonstration does not constitute a waiver of that same right”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“... the possibility that a particular piece of evidence might conceivably have been altered does not bar its introduction or require the defendant to provide introductory testimony in contravention of his Fifth Amendment privilege. Id., 519 So. 2d at 93 .”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“The trial judge erred in holding that defendant would be subject to 'limited' cross-examination if he chose to display his tattoos to the jury”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.