Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 519 So. 2d 926 - Killen v. Akin

519 So. 2d 926 - Killen v. Akin’s Empirical Analysis

1988

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
1
states following
August 2010
most recently cited

10 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently August 2010

10 state decisions

601988199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 474 So. 2d 77 - Dennis v. Dobbs · Murray v. Webster · Davis v. Folmar. · First Alabama Bank of Montgomery, N. A. v. Coker · Oliver v. Oliver

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “'[A]ny part of [an] agreement that is merged into the judgment is subject to the equity power of the court and is no longer of a contractual nature.'”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “"The authorities establish that forfeiture provisions in lease-sale agreements are not favored, but that they will be upheld when the lessee-vendee has actual *Page 993 or constructive notice that strict compliance is necessary. In making these decisions, courts determine whether the vendee had notice of the requirement of strict compliance and whether the vendee had substantially performed his part of the agreement. Eurton v. Smith , 357 So.2d 324 (Ala. 1978). Waiver of strict compliance is a question of fact. Hamner v. Rock Mountain Lake, Inc. , 451 So.2d 249 (Ala. 1984); Murray v. Webster , 256 Ala. 248 , 54 So.2d 505 (1951); Davis v. Folmar , 203 Ala. 336 , 83 So. 60 (1919)."”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.