Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 519 S.W.2d 868 - Evans v. State

Evans v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1975

Citation profile

55
cited by 55 later decisions
2
states following
June 2010
most recently cited

53 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 55 later decisions — most recently June 2010 · most notably Carrillo v. State (1979), Smith v. Estelle (1979)

53 state decisions

23019751980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Davis v. Alaska · Alford v. United States · Brookhart v. Janis · Smith v. Illinois · Luna v. Beto

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 55 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““These cases underscore the well-established rule (and exception to Art. 38.29, V.A.C.C.P.) that great latitude is allowed the accused in showing any fact, including pending charges, which would tend to establish ill feeling, bias, motive, and animus on the part of any witness testifying against him.””
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “claim of bias, interest and motive which the defense sought to develop was admissible to afford a basis for an inference of undue pressure because of [the witness's] vulnerable status as an indictee, as well as [the witness's] possible concern that he might be a suspect in the offense.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “constitutional error of the first magnitude and no amount of showing of want of prejudice will cure it.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.