Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 519 SW3D 413 - Tisius v. State

Tisius v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2017

Citation profile

20
cited by 20 later decisions
1
states following
August 2019
most recently cited

20 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Strickland v. Washington · North Carolina v. Alford · Chambers v. Mississippi · Atkins v. Virginia · Roper Superintendent Potosi Correctional Center v. Simmons

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “To meet this test, the movant must first establish that appellate counsel's performance was deficient. This requires a showing that the attorney failed to exercise the level of skill and diligence that a reasonably competent counsel would in a similar situation. The error overlooked on appeal must have been so obvious that a competent and effective lawyer would have recognized and asserted it. In evaluating an attorney's performance, this Court must eliminate the distorting effects of hindsight ... [and] evaluate the conduct from counsel's perspective at the time. In addition to showing counsel's performance was deficient, the movant must also demonstrate the deficient performance resulted in prejudice to his defense. Prejudice occurs when there is a reasonable probability that, but for counsel's unprofessional errors, the result of the proceeding would have been different.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “To prevail on a claim of ineffective assistance of appellate counsel, the movant must establish that counsel failed to raise a claim of error that was so obvious that a competent and effective lawyer would have recognized and asserted it.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “Ordinarily, the failure to call a witness will not support an ineffective assistance of counsel claim because the choice of witnesses is presumptively a matter of trial strategy.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.