In re Howes’s Empirical Analysis
2012
Citation profile
9 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1001 (Comprehensive Thrift and Bank Fraud Prosecution and Taxpayer Recovery Act of 1990) · 18 U.S.C. § 641 (Livestock Fraud Protection Act) · 28 U.S.C. § 1821
Relies on Brady v. State of Maryland · Giglio v. United States · Imbler v. Pachtman · Berger v. United States · Matter of Addams
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“foster a tendency toward inconsistent dispositions for comparable conduct or would otherwise be unwarranted,”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“Generally speaking, if the Board's recommended sanction falls within a wide range of acceptable outcomes, it will be adopted and imposed.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. In re Harry Tun“we must accept the Board's evidentiary findings if they are supported by substantial evidence in the record,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.