Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 52 A3D 887 - In re D.S.

In re D.S.’s Empirical Analysis

2012

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
2
states following
October 2013
most recently cited

5 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Santosky v. Kramer · Stanley v. Illinois · Meyer v. State of Nebraska · Pierce v. Society of the Sisters of the Holy Names of Jesus and Mary Same · Lehr v. Robertson

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “physically available at that time to serve as a resource,” and the fact that the family had had prior contacts with CFSA. Counsel for the father disputed the significance of the prior contacts and argued that each of the referrals was either unfounded or inconclusive. The court considered the prior contacts while explicitly”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
  2. “a two or a three bedroom” apartment. Almost three months after the children’s removal from their mother's home, the government still claimed to have insufficient information to allow the father to have unsupervised visits, no less custody of his children. For his part, the father stated at the hearing that he had”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
  3. “reasonable efforts” to prevent removal of the child from the home. D.C.Code § 16-2312(d)(3). Relatedly, D.C.Code § 16-2310(b) states that a child cannot be placed in shelter care unless it is clear that shelter care is required to protect the child or because he has no parent or other person to care for him and”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.