Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 52 Ala. App. 174 - Mitchell v. State

52 Ala. App. 174 - Mitchell v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1974

Citation profile

11
cited by 11 later decisions
1
states following
October 1982
most recently cited

11 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Wong Sun v. United States · United States v. Wade · Stovall v. Denno · Kirby v. Illinois · Stokley v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Since the only identification of the appellant by the State witness, prosecutrix, was at the preliminary trial and the main trial, her failure to make a positive identification of the appellant beforehand at a line up or at a showing of pictures, though properly admissible as testimony, is not conclusive, but may and should be considered along with any other testimony showing any and all opportunities that she may have had personally to view or have any contact with the appellant.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.