52 Ala. App. 224 - Eubanks v. Eubanks’s Empirical Analysis
1974
Citation profile
66 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 66 later decisions — most recently June 1990 · most notably 55 Ala. App. 254 - Sutton v. Sutton (1975), 55 Ala. App. 697 - Meyers v. Meyers (1975)
66 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Brady v. Brady · King v. King · 47 Ala. App. 443 - Body v. Body · Pope v. Pope · Wells v. Wells
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 66 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““As noted above, if the award is one for alimony, the amount of such award depends upon the facts of the particular case. Self v. Self, [ 49 Ala.App. 665 , 275 So.2d 345 ]. If the action of the trial court is a division of property then, even in that event, such a division does not require an equal division of the estate but one graduated according to the nature of the case.” Citing Lovett v. Lovett, 11 Ala. 763 ; Pope v. Pope, 268 Ala. 513 , 109 So.2d 521 ; 27B C.J.S. Divorce § 291(1); 8 Ala.Dig.Divorce @=252.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage““In this case, as in all cases where the judgment or decree is entered by the trial court after the hearing of testimony ore terms, such judgment or decree is presumed correct and will be reversed on appeal only if, after consideration of all the evidence and all reasonable inferences to be drawn therefrom, we conclude that it is plainly and palpably wrong.” Eubanks v. Eubanks, 52 Ala.App. 224 , 291 So.2d 159 , and cases therein cited.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.