Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 52 Ala. App. 279 - Hare v. State

52 Ala. App. 279 - Hare v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1974

Citation profile

12
cited by 12 later decisions
1
states following
October 1979
most recently cited

12 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Pate v. Robinson · Aaron v. State · Seibold v. State · Lokos v. State · Campbell v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"The applicable elements of second degree burglary are: (1) breaking, (2) entering, (3) with intent to steal or to commit a felony. The evidence, without contradiction, shows the first two ingredients. Behel v. State , 40 Ala. App. 689 , 122 So.2d 537 . From Behel , this Court per Cates, J., stated: `The jury may reasonably infer intent to steal from the mere presence of the accused in the shop in circumstances showing a breaking and entering in the night. . . .'" [Cases cited]”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.