Finley v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1973
Citation profile
4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
January 1974
most recently cited
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Ballard v. State · Smith v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““In appellant’s motion for a new trial, he insisted the trial court committed reversible error in not permitting defense counsel to inquire of the jury panel the following interrogatories in Exhibit ‘A,’ of the Motion to Conduct a Fair and Reasonably Extensive Voir Dire: “ ‘52. Have any of you sat on a Grand Jury in this Circuit within the past two years ? “ ‘If so: (a) Who has sat on the Grand Jury ? “ ‘53. Have any of you sat on a Grand Jury in the County more than two years ago ? “‘If so: (a) Who (b) When’””
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. Finley v. State · Finley v. State““The proposed inquiries were important to the peremptory challenge procedure and should have been permitted. Their denial hampered counsel in his exercise of this process and resulted in prejudice to the appellant. Based on these facts, the motion for a new trial should have been granted, and the court’s failure to do so was reversible error.””
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. Finley v. State · Finley v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.