Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 52 Ala. App. 64 - Flurry v. State

52 Ala. App. 64 - Flurry v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1973

Citation profile

64
cited by 64 later decisions
2
states following
January 1995
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 62 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 64 later decisions — most recently January 1995 · most notably Harper v. State (1982), Rowe v. Griffin (1982)

2 federal appellate · 62 state decisions

340197319801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Blue v. State · Maund v. State · Godau v. State · Sanders v. Scarvey · 36 Ala. App. 507 - Littlefield v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 64 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Appellant has not shown and does not now allege such injury and prejudice as were demonstrated in these two cases. When questions are so phrased as to call for an answer only when applicable to the individual juror, the appellant cannot complain of lack of responses. There is no requirement that each juror answer each question either yes or no; under these circumstances, it is permissible for a juror to sit silent until a question applies to him in a manner demanding a response.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “parties have a right to have questions answered truthfully by prospective jurors to enable wise and informed exercise of their peremptory strikes and that when jurors fail to answer questions correctly, the parties are denied the exercise of that right.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “the burden is on the defendant to show to the reasonable satisfaction of the court that impartial trial and an unbiased verdict cannot be reasonably expected.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.