Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 52 Ariz. 256 - Schwartz v. Durham

Schwartz v. Durham’s Empirical Analysis

1938

Citation profile

43
cited by 43 later decisions
2
states following
March 1982
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 41 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 43 later decisions — most recently March 1982 · most notably Armer v. Armer (1970), Spector v. Spector (1963)

2 federal appellate · 41 state decisions

140193819401950196019701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Tourette v. Tourette · Williams v. Williams · Wadsworth v. Wadsworth · Durham v. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. of California · Huston v. Ohio & Colorado Smelting & Refining Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 43 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Under our law, community property belongs equally to both husband and wife, and when it is divided between the parties in consequence of divorce proceedings, while it is true that the court has wide discretion as to what portion shall be awarded to each party, nevertheless in the absence of some reason requiring a contrary action, the presumption is that the parts received by each spouse should be substantially equivalent(Emphasis added) 52 Ariz. at 265 , 80 P.2d 456 .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.