Moore v. State

Decided November 15, 1889

Supreme Court of Arkansas · decided 1889-11-15

B. F. Grace, Special Judge. / The appellant, Moore, was convicted upon an indictment •charging that he refused to work o'n a public road after having been duly warned, as the law directs. The evidence shows that the defendant was warned on Saturday to work the road •on the following Tuesday, Wednesday and Thursday and that he did not attend on either day.

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently March 2005

1 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1889-11-15

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Per Curiam.

¶1Public Roads Notice. Notice on Saturday to one liable to road, duty to work a road on the following Tuesday, Wednesday and Thursday, was not sufficient notice to work on Tuesday,, because three full days did not intervene (State v. Jones, 42 Ark., 93), but was good as to the other days.

¶2Affirm.