Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 52 ARK 341 - Apel v. Kelsey

Apel v. Kelsey’s Empirical Analysis

1889

Citation profile

28
cited by 28 later decisions
3
states following
October 1946
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 25 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 28 later decisions — most recently October 1946 · most notably Collins v. Paepcke-Leicht Lumber Co. (1905), Shultz v. Young (1943)

2 federal appellate · 25 state decisions

901889189019001910192019301940decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 28 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The most important interests, the guardianship of widows, children and estates, are committed to their superintending care. Some possibly are dishonest, many are not wise or discriminating. Taking into account the magnitude of the property interests which they have in charge, these courts should be required to proceed in exact conformity to law, instead of being panoplied by the presumptions which attend the exercise of superior jurisdictions by other courts.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. ““It is impossible upon principle to distinguish the . question here presented from those so often decided heretofore; and in obedience to the settled doctrine of this court, fixing the character of the probate court, and the effect of its judgments, we hold that a private sale of land by an administrator, upon order of that court, is not void when confirmed.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.